Recently I have seen a lot of advertisements for online
naturopathic training in the US. I have even read where some people
adamantly defend their online
naturopathic diplomas. Although I am sure that they worked hard, and gained
insight into some areas of natural medicine, I cannot see its applicability to becoming a doctor.
In contrast to online naturopath education, accredited schools train naturopaths to be primary care providers. As an example, this year (my second year at CCNM) we had the
privilege to learn and practice physical & clinical diagnosis (
PCD) of every body system. We had standardized patients for the male genital and female breast exams and our final practical exams this year will be on standardized patients. Next year our
PCD training will include female gynecological exams on standardized patients.
Although there is substantial reading and preparation (including lecture time on theory) required before we attend the
PCD practicals, the understanding and applicability of the theory is not complete until we work through the practical sessions, get feedback from supervisors and our
colleagues, and learn from our mistakes. Many times subtle differences in technique can miss a diagnosis. Nothing can replace practical learning.
I can not
imagine how online training prepares for practice as a doctor since doctors treat patients not computers. Certainly, one could learn about the theoretical
aspects of medicine but be left without any idea of how to actually be effective with patients. Especially for those who live in the US, for your safety, please make sure you see a
naturopath who graduated from one of the
Accredited Schools.